🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.